home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: stud.uni-frankfurt.de!not-for-mail
- From: "Martin Steigerwald" <steigerw@stud.uni-frankfurt.de>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Subject: Re: "AFS" Ami-File Safe
- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 1996 15:37:20 +0100
- Organization: J. W. Goethe-Universitaet Frankfurt/Main
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <71272874@sunshine.stud.uni-frankfurt.de>
- References: <19960329.7F924E8.DDCF@ccubb.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin003.rz.uni-frankfurt.de
-
- David Evans schrieb in comp.sys.amiga.applications ueber "Re: "AFS"
- Ami-File Safe":
-
- DE>MS> Even with AFSbeta16.15 there is no problem...
-
- DE>MS> And also no cpu time problems but that improved in the 16.x betas
- DE>MS> anyway...
-
- DE>All my problems with AFS seem to have been related to the fact of
- DE>reading / writing small files. I recently found a REASON for AFS
-
- Yeah, that was a problem... however the new betas of AFS are significantly
- improved upon this... WW saves it textfiles twice as fast with newer AFS
- betas...
-
- However these are betas, but AFS16.15betads runs stable on _all_ my
- partitions since weeks...
-
- DE>however! Large hard-drives! It seems to work (where FFS doesn't) on a
- DE>4 gig+ hard-drive. FFS will corrupt my 3rd partition (3 partition
- DE>drive) where AFS doesn't seem to have a problem at all.
-
- FFS should also work an 4+gig drive, if you do not use partitions >2GB...
-
- the same is with AFS <=15.9
-
- AFS16.15betads supports partitions >2GB through its direct scsi
- facility... However I couldnt test this out.... since I do not have that
- large hard drives...
-
- Let the sun shine... \__INet| Usenet: steigerw@stud.uni-frankfurt.de
- |_| _ |o _ _ Martin \__ | WWW-Homepage:
- | |(/_||(_)_> Steigerwald \| http://www.rz.uni-frankfurt.de/~steigerw
-
- Amiga Power Computing... ready for take off...
-
-